| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 |
161. [Retribution 1.1] Armor Tanking 2.0 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Takeshi Yamato wrote: The Ancillary Armor Repairer : my first thought is that laser ships get screwed because they already need a cap injector for their weapons and tend to have low cargo capacity. Other than this it seems like an extremely p...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2013.01.21 21:02:00
|
162. [Retribution 1.1] Armor Tanking 2.0 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Changes look great :D
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2013.01.21 20:49:00
|
163. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CaptainFalcon07 wrote: Prometheus Exenthal wrote: Overall, this doesn't rustle my jimmies. However, the Harbinger does look a wee bit outgunned. You're now reducing its fitting, reducing base HP, removing a high (for consistency) but also r...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2013.01.08 21:24:00
|
164. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Overall, this doesn't rustle my jimmies. However, the Harbinger does look a wee bit outgunned. You're now reducing its fitting, reducing base HP, removing a high (for consistency) but also removing a turret hardpoint, in addition to making it SLO...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2013.01.08 21:17:00
|
165. [Video] DRONE HARASSMENT - solo/duo/small scale pvp - in My EVE [original thread]
Finally got around to watching this. Felt really disjointed because the whole soundtrack was used, with stop & go between each fight. Kinda ruined it for me. With that said, most of the fight quality was pretty good, despite being linked. F...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.11.12 09:48:00
|
166. Sticky:Attack frigate changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mortimer Civeri wrote: Prometheus Exenthal wrote: look at the market again, and ignore EFTs stupid estimations. total fitting cost is ~10m which par for the course when T2 fitting any T1 frigate. if you still think those are loot pinatas,...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.06.19 13:10:00
|
167. Sticky:Attack frigate changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mortimer Civeri wrote: Prometheus Exenthal wrote: Soo, the Atron is in a completely different class than the rest of these. Here are some stats utilizing all slots (utility nos); eHP scales from 3200 (Atron w/ Neutrons) to 4450 (Executioner...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.06.19 03:03:00
|
168. Sticky:Attack frigate changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Soo, the Atron is in a completely different class than the rest of these. Here are some stats utilizing all slots (utility nos); eHP scales from 3200 (Atron w/ Neutrons) to 4450 (Executioner w/ DLPs) dps scales from 90 (Rocket Condor) to 207 (Atr...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.06.18 23:43:00
|
169. Sticky:Inferno Features on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Anariasis wrote: To the Cap-Booster fueled Shield-Booster: Most useless Module ever. - Boosts a tiny amount of shield - Can only fit 3 (YES THREE!) charges - 60 seconds reload, wtf? You are incorrect about all except the last statement. - Th...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.05.08 22:40:00
|
170. War Dec, Kill Reports and New Modules discussion - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Bloodpetal wrote: Ohh Yeah wrote: Bloodpetal wrote: After testing a Sleipnir with an XL Anc Shield Booster and testing an XL Shield Booster with cap booster, the cap booster setup just performs better because there's a lot of other stuff ...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.05.06 00:27:00
|
171. War Dec, Kill Reports and New Modules discussion - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP SoniClover wrote: Prometheus Exenthal wrote: @SoniClover Okay, if you doubled all the stats I'll give you the benefit of the doubt up until Monday when it goes up Did you adjust the DURATION as well? Because I think that should stay ...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.05.05 08:12:00
|
172. War Dec, Kill Reports and New Modules discussion - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
@SoniClover Okay, if you doubled all the stats I'll give you the benefit of the doubt up until Monday when it goes up Did you adjust the DURATION as well? Because I think that should stay put if not be a second longer. Also, I highly recommen...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.05.04 17:37:00
|
173. War Dec, Kill Reports and New Modules discussion - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Lady Vorax wrote: Quote: Fueled Shield booster (Small/Medium/Large Ancillary Shield Booster), using Cap Boosters as charges And farewell to armour tanking, that new mod doesnt even come close to compensating for a instant boost...... What...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.05.04 16:16:00
|
174. War Dec, Kill Reports and New Modules discussion - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
THAT is a terrible idea & would be broken. I'll just leave you guys to think about why. Think about SPR tanking, only amplify it with that idea lol. I think you (the players) are missing the point of the boosters. They aren't supposed to repl...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.05.04 00:17:00
|
175. War Dec, Kill Reports and New Modules discussion - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I remember that discussion, and I also remember posting up a possible solution The issue with the *temporary* boosting is that A, it doens't boost anywhere near enough to be used as you'd like, and B, the reload time is faaaar too crippling. Wh...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.05.03 22:50:00
|
176. War Dec, Kill Reports and New Modules discussion - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I think the only major mod things that really need to be discussed involve the tanking mods. The drone mod simply needs to be better (less fitting, more bonus), and the CPU rig needs to be balanced so we don't have people getting fits that shouldn...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.05.03 21:58:00
|
177. Sticky:Inferno Features on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I think the only major things that really need to be discussed involve the tanking mods. The drone mod simply needs to be better (less fitting, more bonus), and the CPU rig needs to be balanced so we don't have people getting fits that shouldn't b...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.05.03 21:51:00
|
178. [VIDEO] Appreciation - in My EVE [original thread]
Thanks for the comments, but it's youtube link has been in the since it's release as well as my whole backlog http://www.youtube.com/user/promsrage
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.05.03 08:38:00
|
179. Sticky:Combat frigate changes for Inferno - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rep bonus on a T1 frigate is useless. Doubly so on an a blaster frigate. The reason? 3 mids, 3 highs, & hybrids. A hybrid ship thrives on two things; range control & capacitor. 3 highs means it can't fit a nos to use that rep, and 3 mids...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.04.24 21:59:00
|
180. Sticky:Armor / shield rig changes for Inferno - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
As much as I am giddy at the concept of nerfing passive tanks and boosting active tanks, this is the wrong way to go about it. Yes, passive tanking is insanely powerful, specifically shields. Yes, active tanking is the black sheep of tanking, spec...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.04.23 19:18:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |